Semester 2 Blog
I have banished this blog to the depths of the world wide web, my new blog is at http://g0tmilk.blogspot.com/

By the way, my word count on this blog is 10,000! And only worth 20%!
I have banished this blog to the depths of the world wide web, my new blog is at http://g0tmilk.blogspot.com/

This is my Creative Computing minor project 2.5Mb





As the semester comes to a close, and assignments close in all around me, I stop to ponder the times I’ve had. Then I keep going with my assignments.

Dirty Harry was in fine form today- I am curious if these LP’s that he brings in are in fact his own. Steve Reich “Electric Counterpoint” (1987) was the first meal served, and was quite enjoyable. I have asked several people to explain counterpoint to me, and every answer is different, as is every piece of music that considers itself counterpoint. There is a ‘bubblegum punk’ band called “Fall Out Boy”, who supposedly use counterpoint in their songs. Their songs sound like crap. Anyway, Pat Methany played guitar for this piece. Good on him.
Next was Tristram Cary “Soft Walls” (1980), which was a vast sound scape of mediocre beeps. I’m sure in 1980 it was ‘radical’, but I wasn’t even born yet. “Ooh, but he’s a guy from our uni.” So what, I can’t have an opinion? I could do something like that today in 2 hours max. I know, 1980 etc., my point is if I composed a piece of music, I would want technology to move on, in affect making my work obsolete, and I wouldn’t expect any future person to find it relevant to their time. Very little of this ‘abstract electronica’ is timeless, as evolution is an integral part of the genre. Each piece is merely a stepping stone to the next, and while we can appreciatively look at the footprints left behind with a retrospective tear in our eye, it doesn’t change the fact that it rarely sounds good today. For those “But in 1980 is was really difficult” people: we need to keep a fresh mind, one capable of accepting and utilising new technologies, and not weighed down with “In MY day we had to use a blade and reel-to-reel tape, and we had to do it while walking barefoot on broken glass in -4C rain.” I’ll book your nursing home for you.
I haven't had much sleep…
Always a fan of Pink Floyd, “Interstellar Overdrive” (1966) was their first experimental song. This is quite noticeable, as the ‘experimental’ part, including an organ and various synthesisers, are huddled in amongst Floydian guitars, as if they are too scared to be in the song alone. To quote Dirty Harry: “They were the earliest band to go strange.” Steve Reich popped in for another visit, this time with “After the War” (1988). I have consistently enjoyed any piece played by the Kronos Quartet, and this was no exception. The strings mimicked voices that simulate a speaker on a train, and turned the everyday speech into a musical motif. With each new vocal excerpt or train sound, the strings would follow suit, with enjoyable consequences. Finally, we listened to Tristram Cary’s “Steam Music” (1978). Ironic that after my spiel about ‘ignoring the old days’, Tristram manages to rip off Pierre Schaeffer’s pioneering composition “Etude aux Chemins de Fer" (Railroad Study).
Audio Arts(2) revolved around psychophysical mixing. Some great tips were imparted, especially delay tricks using panning, and ‘windowing’, which I have already started applying to my project.
Creative computing (3) involved using a noise gate in ProTools and routing a signal through the side-chain input.(4) I’m sure this will be of great use to me in the future, perhaps when I do my creative computing major project, but for now I am content with remaining confused about it.
Spiel and pilfer are cool words, aren’t they?
1. David Harris. “Music Technology Workshop: Listening Session.” Lecture presented at Electronic Music Unit, University of Adelaide, South Australia, 8/06/2006.
2. Christian Haines. “Audio Arts: Psychophysical Mixing.” Practical class presented at the Electronic Music Unit, University of Adelaide, South Australia, 6/06/2006.
3. Christian Haines. “Creative Computing: ProTools Gates.” Practical class presented at the Electronic Music Unit, University of Adelaide, South Australia, 8/06/2006.
4. John Delaney, “Music Technology Journal - Week 13” Intangent http://intangent.blogspot.com (accessed 8/6/06)
A final cheers to John “Kitchen Aid” Delaney. Your blogs throughout this semester have been a great source to pilfer references, as well as general reminders of what we did in CC and AA. Thanks everyone for your comments, except for you Bach, you old geezer.
Dear Blogger,
Thanks for nothing. You made blogging more difficult than licking your own elbow. I hope you've had fun letting me upload pictures then not giving me the html text.
Ben xxx
Get this- I was actually 'inspired' by one of the pieces that Dirty “Dirts” Harry presented us (1). See how far I have come? Nobukazu Takemura’s “Assembler Mix” sounded like an old movie soundtrack looping under other fragments of the same movie. It was very much rhythmically based, almost ‘groovy’ as they say, and towards the end some sine waves were introduced as the whole scene came crashing down into what could be described as mush. Something that Colonel John Delaney and I noticed was some barely audible sounds up in the high 17kHz range. On the subject of the Colonel, it is interesting that somebody else has noticed you can hear that a television is turned on when you aren’t actually in earshot. I thought I was able to hear electromagnetic waves, however it turns out I’m not that cool.
Next up was “Snarling Wrath of Angry Gods” by Gutbucket from their album “Dry Humping the American Dream”. Despite the ultra-cool name, I didn’t get the “Snarling” at all. The odd key signature and mix of heavy guitar and brass instruments gave the impression that the Angry Gods have disparate musical tastes, however the saxophone solo was possibly the best saxophonophony* I have ever heard.
Continuing the ‘comparative’ format of the most recent listening sessions, Dirts unleashed some Bach on us (HEY! That’s a great name for a dog! Bach! Ha ha ha!). The piece was a 6 voice improvisation that Bach created for a guy that had thrown together an abstract theme, on which the piece was based. The sound of a harpsichord certainly gets old quickly, and I would like to hear the piece played on a grand piano. Still, what doesn’t sound good on a grand piano? Well, Slipknot wouldn’t.I’m getting sidetracked again.The next piece was “Kyrie” by Toby Twining. The main feature of this piece was the vocal harmonics, of which Patrick and I can emulate to a lesser extent, and even though the piece built up to a rich collage of sound, it still felt like it didn’t go anywhere.
Arnold Driblatt’s “Lapse” had a heavy emphasis on rhythm, and the overall sound had a “Chinese street-corner lute-band” feel to it. Varying tempos helped maintain interest, seeing as there seemed to be no structure to the melodic or harmonic progression. It turns out the song was based on the overtone series, which trying to explain would be both boring and word-consuming. Hardcore Chinese Opera” by Otomo Yoshihide won some fans with screaming being the focal point. Lastly Igor Stravinsky’s “Symphonies of Wind Instruments” fail to get a rise from me.
The Artist Talk this week was a free-for-all student presentation seminar, where Vinny Bhagat presented a song of unrequited musicianship, Patrick McCartney informed us of his ‘lunar’tic plan of astroterrestrial composition and Tyrell presented some sounds of people touching live instrument leads. I would have hired a stripper, but I guess I’ll have to wait until I’m teaching my own class.

I had never given much though to times before telephony, and it was quite a revelation to me that the advanced forms of communication that we use every day are in fact creating a world with similar views, ethics and opinions. I am curious if this will somehow lead to a united world, however the results are more likely represented in this still from Futurama, a cartoon set in the year 3000.

Enter prog-circus (2). My first foray into Mr. Bungle was with the piece “Love Is A Fist”, which starts as though it is a heavy metal rock song, then playfully swings between jazz and rock, then back into heavy metal . I truly enjoyed this piece (Shock! Horror!) for what it was (Oh…), with obvious talent shown in the ease of transfer between different musical genres. I could not educe where I had heard the name “Mr Bungle” until I heard the introduction of “Dead Goon”. Much like a 1950’s educational video for children, a voiceover told the story of Mr. Bungle and his lack of hygiene in the lunchroom to which I recalled an actual video of this very sound sample, which used puppets to show distasteful lunchtime antics. Perhaps this was the video clip of “Dead Goon”? Anyway, the actual music was funk in a minor key crossed with acid jazz, which fell into the aforementioned circus music intermittently. With heavy metal style vocals over the top of a chromatic scale, I certainly didn’t fall asleep, or rather couldn’t fall asleep. I’m sure ‘fans’ in the room will rave about it, but I’m sure it was intentionally silly and controversial, not a piece to be perceived as serious musical composition. Like in the previous piece, it is obvious that Mr. Bungle are talented musicians, however the overall structure is organised in a disorderly fashion*.
Stockhausen was a step down in interest, with the short wave radio recording “Hymnen” (1966-67). I have often created pieces just like this when searching around on the signal test radio in EMU, which gave me an epiphany of what Musique Concrete actually is. It is: Difficult to put into words. Another of ‘Stocks’’ pieces was played, however it was merely talking, which I have also done often. My Bloody Valentine gave us this week’s “wall of sound” song, with “To Here Knows When” involving normal female singing on top of was seems like 2 LP’s player simultaneously. It was difficult to discern any actual instruments, yet it was interestingly in tune.
Cheers to David for some more comparative listening in this week’s workshop. Did you know there was an actor called David Harris in the 1979 film, “The Warriors”? There was also a David Harris put to death in Texas, but that must have been a different David.
Classical music remixed live isn’t exactly my forte, in fact I doubt it is anyone’s forte, yet with 6 billion people in the world there had to be someone who wanted to scratch up an orchestral LP. Christian Marclay woke up one morning and said, “Yeah, why the hell not”, and unfortunately I wasn’t there to say “Coz it’s stupid.” Although it would be questionable why I was there when he woke up anyway. We were informed in Thursday’s listening workshop (1) that this vinyl-rubbing prodigy can ‘command’ up to 8 turntables at once, which would also mean he could wash up and dry the dishes at the same time. Johann Strauss was injured in the making of the first piece (well, his artistic creation was), and not for any great reason, as the result was just a muddle of occasionally distinguishable chords and melody. While we’re spitting on history, Jimi Hendrix lost a few metaphorical limbs as Marclay scratched around on LP’s that now days would score you a couple hundred bucks at Cashies. The side comment of the piece “Play back at high volume” is a complete joke. Hendrix didn’t have that on his LP’s, he didn’t need to state it- you would WANT to crank it up! I’ll listen to music however I like, starting with turning this song down to zero.
Audio arts (1) was an introduction into microphone choice and placement. Having done several ‘extracurricular’ recordings this year already, I have had a fair amount of experience with the microphones available. It seems to be the general consensus that the most expensive are always the best (“Just grab the Nygen”), but for me it has been experimenting with a variety to choose what is best for each specific sound source. If I’m recording a vocalist in the deadroom, I often set up 2 different microphones for the first take, and then (possibly) use the one that had an less desirable recording as a room mic. I like to think that I’m covering my bases, as if I only had one microphone and nothing to compare it to, I might be missing out on something better.
Continuing the treacherous swim through the ProTools mutagenic lake, Creative Computing (2) had us remixing the Nine Inch Nails song ‘Only’. After 4 hours of sampling loops and ambience from other NIN songs*, I used Luke’s hard drive to transfer the collection of files to an Audio Lab computer. Upon opening the ‘Only’ ProTools session from the drop box, I began deleting all the repeated files until I was left with just the ‘skin and bones’ of the song. I then imported all of my samples, giving each different song’s collection of samples its own track. Let the games begin! Roughly 6 hours of ‘time compression/expansion’ later, and I had this to show. Some of the timing is out, but it got to 11:30 on Sunday night and I had to run in the rain to catch my bus. Good times! I am aware I didn’t need to go to the extent of sampling, but once I got stuck into it I didn’t see any reason to stop. I conveniently waited until 20 minutes before my bus before realising that I had no way to save the session - I don’t have a portable hard drive. I managed to save all the files to a CD, but so far the session will not open up again.
David Harris went out on a limb for this week’s listening session (3), and played a diversity of electronic music. Looks like my prayers were answered, as we were able to compare abstract works such as music concrete "Voile d'Orphée" (1953) from Pierre Henry to modern(ish) songs like “Breathe” from Pink Floyd. I found some interesting “Breathe” folklore. We also heard a very early Pink Floyd song called “Bike”, which was shockingly bad. Here’s the lyrics if you want a good laugh. Much to my appreciation, Led Zeppelin’s excellent “Whole Lotta Love” was played, and there was also a Frank Zappa piece "Mr. Green Genes" which did little to inspire. Although this certainly inspired thought.I was sick for the first week of holidays, thanks to nobody in particular *coughchristiancough*.
The David Harris portion of our workshop consisted of more ‘pushing the boundaries’ music. I read in someone else’s blog that they want some real perspective in the music we listen to at these sessions and I am definitely starting to agree with this view. Sure, Edgard Varese is important to the history of technologically created music, but the perspective would come from comparing Varese to say, Fatboy Slim. Drawing comparisons between history and the music it has inspired would undoubtedly get the interest levels high. In a future blog I may create my own comparisons, so watch this space.
We first listened to “Voyage Des Unari Vers Androméde”, created by Iannis Xenakis (1922 - 2001) (above) in 1989.Considering this piece’s namesake of our nearest neighbouring galaxy Andromeda, there seems to be no actual reference to space itself. Made using graphs that were read by a computer, Androméde was a frightfully diverse collection of waves, with extreme high and low frequencies being reached, and possibly some ultra and subsonic sounds beyond the human ear’s perception. Next up was Garbrielle Manca’s piece, “In Flagranti” (1999). Using an acoustic guitar and a slide, Geoffrey Morris (right)
played this difficult piece with ease, and I was surprised that such complexity could be composed, let alone played on a single guitar. The final piece was “Rubric” by Phil Glass (left). Created for his ‘band’, the instrumentation of this song was very much rhythmically inclined. Most of the instruments, real or synthesised, were playing the same melody in repetition, with changes in timing marking the only real progression of the song.
My left ear was blocked all this week, so forgive me if my blog is a little ‘one-sided’. In any case, this is my ‘monocracy‘.
Our workshop began with ‘Ecuatorial’ (1932-34), by Edgar Varèse. It uses a very complex collection of instruments, originally including two theremins, which were later replaced by ondes martinots in the published version of the song (1). Large and intricate chords would swell up every now and then in the wind instruments, and sometimes in the strings. The percussion was mostly a mix of loud and quiet instrumentation, but still added shock value. A baritone voice seems to sit around in the quiet parts, and is quickly made superfluous by the roaring trumpets. [Camera Press Ltd, London / photo Walter Bursten/Queen]
Milton Babbit is the first person to use ‘total serialism’(2), as exemplified in “Ensembles for Synthesiser”. Listening to the piece, I had several interpretations of the sounds, including various ringing phones, and Atari 2600 music. There was no musical form, but there wasn’t meant to be. A thought occurs: without musical form, what can be done in 10 minutes that can’t be done in 5? The piece was way too long, and I found myself gazing out the window thinking “If we were meant to be monogamous, why aren’t we born already married?” [Camera Press Ltd, London / photo Vytas Valaitis]
The forum was an actual forum this time, with Stephen Whittington, Mark Carroll and Tristan Louth-Robbins, (eventually) asking the question “Is Music Technology a defined or segregated area of study?” While there were many views and opinions being thrown about, I feel that by the end, the question still remained. Fundamentally, it is difficult to officially define each field of music technology as possible stand alone subjects, as music technology studies have only just begun their integration into the education system. It is not fair to compare it with other well established areas of study that have sometimes had hundreds of years to grow into specialty fields, while music technology has only just become a specialty field itself (of music). Give it time, perhaps our offspring will have a choice? Although I'll need a girlfriend first...
How about that Peak 4 user guide. 268 pages? Try reading through that in one sitting. It seems as though if you’re relatively fluent with any PCM editor, the principal options are the same. All the usual fades, amplifiers, compressors, normalizers etcetera are always present, so my experience with programs such as CoolEdit have basically given me a rundown on the important tools available. I have used it to edit songs in my music library, taking out long, boring introductions and the long silence between a CD’s last track and a hidden track.
Christian help us understand the basics of Spear and Peak, which is always a good place to start. Interestingly, I have a 396kbps sound file which I have been unable to load on any media program, including Audacity and Spear. Spear is the first spectral analysis program that I’ve ever used, and I am certainly amazed at how it works. As I have already had experience in Photoshop style programs, I find Spear to be easy to manipulate.
The John Cage music that we heard on Thursday was a great example of how old the ‘showing off technology’ style of music is. The 1952 musique concrete piece “William’s Mix” had a fantastic sound, and was basically perfectly edited throughout, even though it was done with a razor blade 54 years ago. Nowadays, seamless sound editing can be done by a computer-literate 13 year old, but without a computer it would have been a very painstaking process. The ‘channel-changing’ result actually made me feel anxious, with a little déjà vu of that scene from The Ring where the girl crawls out of the television. It’s interesting that Schoenberg told Cage that he had “No sense of harmony” (1), considering that his piece “101” is essentially ad-libbed orchestral instrumentation. It’s as if he decided that seeing as he has no sense of harmony, he may as well compose something that doesn’t use harmony. His experiences of Zen Buddhism seem to have inspired his efforts for creating music without using musical talent, with an example being the use of coin flipping to decide when instrumental events occur (2).
Creative computing this week involved editing PCM files and the issues with zero crossing. I have covered most of these things through my music tech classes in high school, but it is good to get refreshed on things that I learnt four years ago. I didn’t know that PCM meant Pulse Code Modulation. The picture on the left is of a section of music that made a ‘pop’ sound. Zero crossing, where art thou? In Audio Arts we covered headphone monitoring and using the patch bay effectively. I am still a bit confused about how the headphone amplifier works, so I will have to delve into that in my spare time.
The next piece, “Surf Music II” by Jack Vees, was certainly a tangent to the planned structure of the ‘entrance’ music. There were some fantastic effects at the start that I’m sure took a long time to create, like some of the upper-harmonics that would beat against each other while seeming to pan around the room. As the song moaned on with the deep, dying elephant sound, the collaboration of effects seem to get less organised, conjuring images of audio mixing with a food processor. I've found a real cool Jack Vees piece-Strummage.
In Creative Computing we were shown the uses of meta-data and headers for audio files. My substantial music collection would be moot without them, so I already have an understanding of their importance. With the help of the normalised, half-normalised and thru patching tips I learnt in our Audio Arts session, I was able to dive right into Studio 2. In my first experiment, I introduced myself to the dead room (to which I got no answer*) and eventually hooked up a microphone through the 01v deck, into the DP/4 effects synthesiser and back out to the monitor speakers. Using the wonderful signal test radio, I was able to bastardise all the crap that comes out of SAFM with some fantastic flange and spatial effects (There’s a setting with a ‘Darth Vader’ effect, but the name eludes me).
The artist talk with Gordon Monro was quite interesting, as I hadn’t heard anything like a genetic algorithm attempting to resolve a harmonious chord. Other pieces that were presented were “Red Grains” and a piece that uses ‘sonification of brainwave data’. I found other examples of Gordon Monro’s work: dry rivers sample and voice phase 2 sample. I visited the Evochord display on Hindley at about 9pm, but was disappointed with three things: It was exactly what we saw in class, only slower; It was too quiet with the speakers shut inside a store; It was a lot smaller than I expected. I thought it was going to be projected onto the whole front of a building, but it was just the front window of an empty store. It didn’t help that while I was watching, a girl yelled out of her car window “LONER!”.Week 2 - Warren Burt
Warren Burt has indisputably helped shape the digital music age we are in today. His optimistic view of any technological advancement and an obsession to create, understand and/or improve any new noise fabrication technology that has emerged throughout his career has been groundbreaking. His idea of creating a ‘new form of musical community’ is understandable when examining the position that the music culture is in today, with much less of an emphasis on live performance (1) and the explosion of MP3. He has produced many pioneering masterpieces, such as his work on the ‘Aardvarks IV’ composition machine he built, as well as various other pieces very suited to the modernist age.
Robin Minard was the guest speaker in our first forum. I didn’t know what to expect to happen in these forums, but I was definitely pleasantly surprised. Canadian born Minard studied composition in his home country as well as in Paris, and since the 1980’s his major focus has been sound installation art.(1) An installation that is of particular interest to me is “Silent Music” (1994-95). In museums throughout Germany, Minard created a sound installation, consisting of 100 to 500 high-frequency loudspeakers. This work is intended for use in quiet public places or galleries, with the sounds being emitted creating a ‘colour‘ for the environment. Minard arranged the speakers such that they appeared organic in the environment, even making them ’grow’ attracted to a light source in the room.(2)
Minard’s work is the first truly artistic collection of compositions that I have seen/heard, and his use of sound, structure and aesthetics to make a collage of visual and auditory mediums is quite inspiring. I would love to visit one of his exhibits while he is in town for the Fringe, and experience his work in person. While I normally conform to the mainstream views of what music is, regarding harmony, melody and rhythm, this forum has showed me a new perspective. I believe that Minard’s creations are leaning more towards art than music, but he still uses his musical experience and knowledge in the application of sounds used for spaces. I wish I had 500 speakers in my bedroom.